<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Drowsy Chaperone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bitsofexistence.com/2009/03/the-drowsy-chaperone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bitsofexistence.com/2009/03/the-drowsy-chaperone/</link>
	<description>A Journey of Two</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 04:56:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://bitsofexistence.com/2009/03/the-drowsy-chaperone/comment-page-1/#comment-517</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitsofexistence.com/?p=245#comment-517</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-516&quot; class=&quot;at-regular&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Court&lt;/a&gt;: The set was more substantial when I saw it at the palace, but perhaps the mechanics varied by theater? You saw it before I did originally so for it to get more complicated for the second city would be totally nonsensical. The simplifications were not terribly distracting, just something that I remember differently from last time.

I wonder why they wouldn&#039;t use that joke everywhere. The audience got a particular kick out of it the first time around and I&#039;ve always loved it because I felt like I highlighted Kitty&#039;s simple-mindedness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-516" class="at-regular" rel="nofollow">@Court</a>: The set was more substantial when I saw it at the palace, but perhaps the mechanics varied by theater? You saw it before I did originally so for it to get more complicated for the second city would be totally nonsensical. The simplifications were not terribly distracting, just something that I remember differently from last time.</p>
<p>I wonder why they wouldn&#8217;t use that joke everywhere. The audience got a particular kick out of it the first time around and I&#8217;ve always loved it because I felt like I highlighted Kitty&#8217;s simple-mindedness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Court</title>
		<link>http://bitsofexistence.com/2009/03/the-drowsy-chaperone/comment-page-1/#comment-516</link>
		<dc:creator>Court</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitsofexistence.com/?p=245#comment-516</guid>
		<description>Gangsters from Ohio? I don&#039;t remember if, either time I saw it, Kitty mentioned where the gangsters were from. Huh.

I also noticed about the simplified set - I had supposed, since it was a touring version that was why, but it must not have been since the first time you saw it, it was a tour as well. I wonder why they decided to simplify the set this time around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gangsters from Ohio? I don&#8217;t remember if, either time I saw it, Kitty mentioned where the gangsters were from. Huh.</p>
<p>I also noticed about the simplified set &#8211; I had supposed, since it was a touring version that was why, but it must not have been since the first time you saw it, it was a tour as well. I wonder why they decided to simplify the set this time around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

